Council planning record

Mature Beech tree (T1) - historically a pollard that has lapsed back into a full-grown tree. Stems that originate from pollards points are generally not as secure as stems that have formed naturally, which allows the grain to be optimised. Given the size of the tree and numerous storm events the tree had been subjected to, it is reasonable to assume the structure is sound. In more recent years the tree has been subject to topping, where only the upright growth was removed poorly, this practice can have an adverse effect on the treeâ¿¿s growth. Topping leads to the growth hormones that are in the apical tips being chaotically distributed as the tree goes into panic growth. The tree will adversely react by throwing its resources into restoring its lost growth and none into defence. Cavitation will ensue as the tree has been pruned inappropriately leading to excess oxygen getting into the vascular system which can provide the condition required for hostile fungi to develop. As the tree will not prioritise defence, the structure can become weaker. I had been requested to provide a quote for crown management at Hazel Shaw for crown management by the new owners on the 19th of September, I am familiar with this tree as I drive past regularly. Around 2015 the tree was topped. Upon closer inspection it appears the tree has been historically pollarded. The client felt obliged to manage the crown for the neighbour who has raised complaints regarding trespass, I had informed the client of his obligations and limitations of crown management for Beech. Of concern was the emerging fungi at the root plate, I had looked at this with my colleague and we both believe this to be Meripilus giganteus. On inspection I noted at ground level within the lawn rough 1m out from the buttress on a surface root a juvenile fungal body, this had been hit by a lawn mower-see image 6727, I carefully looked around the root collar and other exposed surface roots but could see no further fungal bodies. I informed the client that I should return in a few weeks to make positive identification as my feel was this could me Meripilus. I returned in 2 weeks to find 5 other further fruiting bodies at various points around a full 360 degrees, these were on the root plate some 1m out from the collar, within folds of the buttresses and directly on buttresses, there is also a significant amount of leaf litter present so I could not rule out further sites. On balance given the location I feel the risk is not tolerable and that further investigation of Meripilus is problematic. T1. Mature Beech a. Dismantle tree in sections, felling close to ground level T2. Indian Bean Tree a. Reduce x 4 laterals with noted defects by up to 1.5m to suitable growth point.

Hazel Shaw, Road Between Whitehall Lane And Judges Road, Checkendon, RG8 0SX

Decision MadeReference: P25/S3278/TPOSouth Oxfordshire District Council

Last published check: 15 Oct 2026, 15:26. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application Received Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Issue Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Application summary

Status
Decision Made
Application type
Not published
Received
16 Oct 2025
Validated
Not published
Determination deadline
Not published
Local authority
South Oxfordshire District Council

Application overview

Mature Beech tree (T1) - historically a pollard that has lapsed back into a full-grown tree. Stems that originate from pollards points are generally not as secure as stems that have formed naturally, which allows the grain to be optimised. Given the size of the tree and numerous storm events the tree had been subjected to, it is reasonable to assume the structure is sound. In more recent years the tree has been subject to topping, where only the upright growth was removed poorly, this practice can have an adverse effect on the treeâ¿¿s growth. Topping leads to the growth hormones that are in the apical tips being chaotically distributed as the tree goes into panic growth. The tree will adversely react by throwing its resources into restoring its lost growth and none into defence. Cavitation will ensue as the tree has been pruned inappropriately leading to excess oxygen getting into the vascular system which can provide the condition required for hostile fungi to develop. As the tree will not prioritise defence, the structure can become weaker. I had been requested to provide a quote for crown management at Hazel Shaw for crown management by the new owners on the 19th of September, I am familiar with this tree as I drive past regularly. Around 2015 the tree was topped. Upon closer inspection it appears the tree has been historically pollarded. The client felt obliged to manage the crown for the neighbour who has raised complaints regarding trespass, I had informed the client of his obligations and limitations of crown management for Beech. Of concern was the emerging fungi at the root plate, I had looked at this with my colleague and we both believe this to be Meripilus giganteus. On inspection I noted at ground level within the lawn rough 1m out from the buttress on a surface root a juvenile fungal body, this had been hit by a lawn mower-see image 6727, I carefully looked around the root collar and other exposed surface roots but could see no further fungal bodies. I informed the client that I should return in a few weeks to make positive identification as my feel was this could me Meripilus. I returned in 2 weeks to find 5 other further fruiting bodies at various points around a full 360 degrees, these were on the root plate some 1m out from the collar, within folds of the buttresses and directly on buttresses, there is also a significant amount of leaf litter present so I could not rule out further sites. On balance given the location I feel the risk is not tolerable and that further investigation of Meripilus is problematic. T1. Mature Beech a. Dismantle tree in sections, felling close to ground level T2. Indian Bean Tree a. Reduce x 4 laterals with noted defects by up to 1.5m to suitable growth point.

Proposal details

Reference
P25/S3278/TPO
Agent
Heritage Tree Services Ltd

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

Hazel Shaw, Road Between Whitehall Lane And Judges Road, Checkendon, RG8 0SX

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 2 of 2

DocumentPublishedAction
04112025 121512 Consent for TPO works WITH REPLACEMENT CONDITIONSTPO - Tree WorksNot publishedView
P25-S3278-TPOTPO - Tree WorksNot publishedView

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Cons. TPO rep. conds
Planning conditions

Conditions aren’t listed here. Read the council decision notice for the full decision and conditions.

Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.