Council planning record

Lime trees (2) as indicated within TPO 2/74 - fell for reasons outlined below and replant as indicated. A property was first erected on the plot of no. 30 in 1953, before which the land belonged to no. 28 and was used as a tennis court. At that time the trees were obviously substantially smaller than they are now and gave no cause for concern. The current size and proximity of the trees (2) give both owners (28 and 30) concerns that their roots will eventually undermine the foundations of the properties (28 and 30), if left to continually grow, with disastrous results. Notwithstanding the above, branches from the trees occasionally fall to the ground with the potential to damage vehicles or hit pedestrians walking beneath. These branches have been up to 75mm in diameter and 1-1.5 metres in length - not inconsiderable - and fortunately have to date fallen onto our drive at no. 30 and not the nursing home at no. 28. Our proposal would be to replace these with a more suitable living boundary with potentially a mixture of the following: . Fagus sylvatica . Cherry laurel . Prunus lauro cerasus rotundifolia . Carpinus betulus fastigiata with possibly one or two Magnolia galaxy. This is a mixture of deciduous and evergreen which we believe would enhance the street scene. The intention would be to consult with Barcham's in Ely whom we previously used when replanting our rear garden at which time they supplied 19 trees of various types, greatly enhancing our enjoyment of the garden.

30 Hall Lane UPMINSTER RM14 1AF

Tree Work Refused (Appealed) Conditions/ReasonsReference: T0093.16London Borough of Havering

Last published check: 15 Oct 2026, 11:28. Check the council record for more recent changes.

We couldn’t update every section. Some information is from an earlier collection.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Decision By

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  2. Received

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Validated

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Decided

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Lodged

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Application summary

Status
Tree Work Refused (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons
Application type
Not published
Received
18 Jul 2016
Validated
18 Jul 2016
Determination deadline
18 Jul 2016
Local authority
London Borough of Havering

Application overview

Lime trees (2) as indicated within TPO 2/74 - fell for reasons outlined below and replant as indicated. A property was first erected on the plot of no. 30 in 1953, before which the land belonged to no. 28 and was used as a tennis court. At that time the trees were obviously substantially smaller than they are now and gave no cause for concern. The current size and proximity of the trees (2) give both owners (28 and 30) concerns that their roots will eventually undermine the foundations of the properties (28 and 30), if left to continually grow, with disastrous results. Notwithstanding the above, branches from the trees occasionally fall to the ground with the potential to damage vehicles or hit pedestrians walking beneath. These branches have been up to 75mm in diameter and 1-1.5 metres in length - not inconsiderable - and fortunately have to date fallen onto our drive at no. 30 and not the nursing home at no. 28. Our proposal would be to replace these with a more suitable living boundary with potentially a mixture of the following: . Fagus sylvatica . Cherry laurel . Prunus lauro cerasus rotundifolia . Carpinus betulus fastigiata with possibly one or two Magnolia galaxy. This is a mixture of deciduous and evergreen which we believe would enhance the street scene. The intention would be to consult with Barcham's in Ely whom we previously used when replanting our rear garden at which time they supplied 19 trees of various types, greatly enhancing our enjoyment of the garden.

Proposal details

Reference
T0093.16
Agent
Mr Barry Toon 30 Hall Lane Upminster RM14 1AF

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

30 Hall Lane UPMINSTER RM14 1AF

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 8 of 8

DocumentPublishedAction
Decision Notice Trees - DN_TREESDecision Notice Trees - DN_TREES5 Sept 2016View
Officer Report for Decision under Delegated AuthorityOfficer Report for Decision under Delegated Authority5 Sept 2016View
Officer Report for Decision under Delegated AuthorityOfficer Report for Decision under Delegated Authority5 Sept 2016View
HAS Acknowledgement LetterHAS Acknowledgement Letter18 Jul 2016View
Application FormApplication Form18 Jul 2016View
tree surveyOther18 Jul 2016View
Covering LetterCovering Letter18 Jul 2016View
PlansPlans18 Jul 2016View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Tree Work Refused (Appealed) Conditions/Reasons

Appeal status: Appeal lodged

Decision Notice Trees - DN_TREES Officer Report for Decision under Delegated Authority Officer Report for Decision under Delegated Authority
Planning conditions

Conditions aren’t listed here. Read the council decision notice for the full decision and conditions.

Related records

Related records could not be loaded.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.